Terroism Yesterday, Future & Chronology

act of bratwurstism Introduction to disquietudeism Susanne Prestininzi April 19, 2013 421 pm One evict non keep blue long-standing debates, going back as far as Aristotle, over when it is semi semipolitically and morally acceptable to use unconventional tactics such as force out and fear to bring ab let disclose political and kindly change. recital is replete with the ideas of great thinkers who believed that, under the right circumstances, unconventional tactics were not only smart, but a moral or civic duty.Religious leadership over the centuries have contributed thoughts about when unjust warfare is just, when holy little terror is justified, and phalanx thinkers have advocated less-than-honorable tactics. Most terrorism throughout history has been enjoin against organisation activitys also called political or transmutationary terrorism, but terrorism can also be global or take the forms of declare terrorism or state-sponsored terrorism. These latter types occur when establishments turn on their own citizens, or try to stir up trouble among the citizenry of another nation.In fact, it was state terrorism that put modern use of the term terrorism in our English vocabulary. Title 22 of the U. S. Code, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub national free radicals or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience. (National Institute of Justice) The Federal authorization of Investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. (fbi. gov) Both definitions of terrorism share a commons theme the use of force intended to influence or touch off a course of treat that furthers a political or social goal. In most cases, NIJ researchers adopt the FBI def inition, which stresses methods over motivations and is generally accepted by law enforcement communities. The first story isnt terrorism. According to the definition, is this terrorism? No, this action is not terrorism. The group who committed the action had an objective, which was to push the US out of Iraq. This is the nly trademark consistent with a terrorist activity. The target was solely a military target carrying U. S. soldiers and the terrorists employed a conventional weapon. Civilians were not targeted during this operation. Therefore, this action was a guerilla military action employed against an opposition force in a realm of conflict. These individuals were freedom fighters seeking to control their country. If I am wrong(p) in my understanding it may be considered domestic terrorism. The bit story again isnt terrorism. This was a U. S. issile strike killed 25 large number in Pakistans North Waziristan region that signaled that Washingtons use of drones against mili tants along the Afghan fence will continue despite intensifying opposition from Pakistani leaders. The third gear one definitely is an act of terrorism by a self-destruction bomber terrorist. A suicide bomber steered a truck fill up with the equivalent of six tons of TNT down the airport avenue in Beirut, Lebanon. He plowed into the four-story barracks where more than 300 U. S. troops from a U. N. peacekeeping mission slept and detonated what the FBI called the largest non-nuclear bomb in history.This is an example of Tactical Terror in order for the Free Islamic Revolutionary Movement in order to bring international attention to their cause. The last story of aquilegia was an act of domestic terrorism. It was an act of terrorism. However, most people wouldnt think of it as a terrorist act. act of terrorism mostly has to do with political ideology however, its not restricted to that. In a perverted way, the perpetrators of Columbine were make a statement, and that is terroris m. There are several different typologies of terrorism act of terrorism classified by place 1.Domestic by residents of a country at heart that country 2. .International by representatives of a country against another country 3. Non-state extremism and revolution for its own sake 4. State-sponsored by a government against its own people or in support of international terrorism against another government 5. Internecine conflict that spills over into another country or fought on foreign soil Terrorism categorise by Personality feature 1. Crazies strong survival military position, but not based in worldly concern self-centered goals clear only to perpetrator irrational and unpredictable strikes at random 2.Crusaders sacrificial, death attitude blends politics and religion seldom unstrained to negotiate task-oriented and indifferent to risk seeks publicity and largest group possible. 3. Criminals strong self-preservation attitude selfish seeks gain and is task-oriented avo ids high risk predictably targets small groups (Hacker 1976) Terrorism Classified by Purpose 1. Political for ideological and political purposes 2. nonpolitical for private purposes or gain 3. Quasi-terrorism skyjacking and hostage taking 4. Limited political ideological but not revolutionary 5.Official or state use by nation against nation or people Terrorism Classified by Target 1. Mass terror targets general population 2. dynastic terror selective targeting of individuals or groups 3. Random terror targets anybody in wrong place at wrong time 4. Focused random terror targets specific public places frequented by opposition 5. Tactical terror attacks government or politically attractive targets (Combs 2003) Terrorism Classified by put out 1. Revolutionary aims to replace the existing government by drawing out repressive responses which can be exposed as inhumane (Red multitude Faction, PLO, Hizballah) 2.Political heavily armed groups tending to be focused around supre macy, government intrusion, or religious revisionism (Aryan Nation, Posse Comitatus, Freemen) 3. Nationalist promotes the interests of a minority or religious group that has been persecuted under majority rule (Sikh radicals, Muslim fundamentalism) 4. Cause-Based groups devoted to a social or religious cause using violence to address their grievances (Islamic Holy War, Abortion clinic bombings) 5. Environmental groups dedicated to slowing down development they believe is harming animals (Animal Liberation Front, Earth 1st) 6.State-sponsored when a repressive regime forces its citizens into total obedience (Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, Iraq, Sudan, Haiti) 7. Nuclear outlaw states possessing nuclear threats (Libya, North Korea) 8. racial extermination when a government seeks to wipe out a minority group in its territory (Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, Iraq, Turkey) Reference Terrorism in the Twenty-First degree centigrade Cynthia C. COmbs www. nij. com www. cia. gov Retrieved April 19, 2013 312 pm You +1d this publicly. Undo