Learning Theory

From Wikipedia, the bighearted encyclopedia Jump to navigation, search This article needs additional citations for verification. enrapture help mitigate this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material whitethorn be challenged and removed. (April 2008) This article whitethorn contain original explore. please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding references. Statements consisting completely if of original search whitethorn be removed. More details may be available on the talk page. (January 2010)In psychology and education, study is comm except(prenominal) defined as a swear let discover that brings together cognitive, emotional, and environsal influences and experiences for acquiring, enhancing, or make changes in unrivalleds friendship, skills, values, and release-baseation views (Illeris, 2000 Ormorod, 1995). Learning as a mathematical surgery focuses on what happens when the development takes place. Explanations of what happe ns frame learning theories. A learning theory is an attempt to describe how muckle and animals learn, thereby helping us to a lower placestand the inherently complex exploit of learning.Learning theories have two chief values according to Hill (2002). star is in providing us with vocabulary and a conceptual framework for interlingual rendition the examples of learning that we observe. The other is in suggesting where to look for solutions to practical problems. The theories do non give us solutions, but they do direct our attention to those variables that ar crucial in finding solutions. There atomic number 18 three briny categories or philosophical frameworks infra which learning theories fall styleism, cognitivism, and constructivism. behaviorism focuses only on the objectively observable aspects of learning.Cognitive theories look beyond behavior to formulate brain-based learning. And constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner actively construct s or builds new ideas or concepts. Contents hide 1 behaviorism 2 Cognitivism 3 Constructivism 4 Informal and post-modern theories 5 separate learning theories 6 Criticism 7 another(prenominal) interests 8 See managewise 9 Notes 10 External links edit Behaviorism Main article Behaviorism Behaviorism as a theory was primarily developed by B. F. mule skinner. It loosely encompasses the work of population want Edward Thorndike, Tolman, Guthrie, and Hull.What characterizes these investigators are their underlying assumptions around(predicate) the process of learning. In essence, three basic assumptions are held to be true. original research? First, learning is manifested by a change in behavior. Second, the environs shapes behavior. And third, the principles of resemblance (how close in time two fonts must be for a bond to be formed) and reinforcement (any means of increasing the likelihood that an outlet pass on be repeated) are central to excuseing the learning process. For behaviorism, learning is the accomplishment of new behavior through teach.There are two types of possible teach 1) Classical instruct, where the behavior be interjects a reflex response to stimulus as in the case of Pavlovs Dogs. Pavlov was interested in studying reflexes, when he see that the dogs drooled without the proper stimulus. Although no food was in sight, their saliva still dribbled. It turn out that the dogs were reacting to lab coats. Every time the dogs were served food, the person who served the food was habiliment a lab coat. Therefore, the dogs reacted as if food was on its way whenever they dictum a lab coat.In a series of experiments, Pavlov then tried to ensure out how these phenomena were linked. For example, he struck a bell when the dogs were fed. If the bell was sounded in close association with their meal, the dogs learned to associate the sound of the bell with food. subsequently a while, at the mere sound of the bell, they responded by drool ing. 2) Operant teach where there is reinforcement of the behavior by a reward or a penalisation. The theory of operant conditioning was developed by B. F. muleteer and is kn admit as Radical Behaviorism.The word operant refers to the way in which behavior operates on the environment. Briefly, a behavior may expiration either in reinforcement, which increases the likelihood of the behavior recurring, or penalty, which decreases the likelihood of the behavior recurring. It is important to note that, a punishment is not considered to be relevant if it does not firmness in the reduction of the behavior, and so the terms punishment and reinforcement are determined as a result of the actions. in spite of appearance this framework, behaviorists are particularly interested in mensurable changes in behavior.Educational mount pathes such as applied behavior analysis, curriculum based measurement, and direct bidding have emerged from this model. 1 edit Cognitivism Main article Co gnitivism (psychology) The earliest challenge to the behaviorists came in a publication in 1929 by Bode, a gestalt psychologist. He criticized behaviorists for being in any case dependent on oert behavior to explain learning. Gestalt psychologists proposed looking at the patterns rather than isolated events. Gestalt views of learning have been incorporated into what have catch to be labeled cognitive theories.Two key assumptions underlie this cognitive approach (1) that the entrepot system is an active organized processor of information and (2) that preliminary association forges an important role in learning. Cognitive theories look beyond behavior to explain brain-based learning. Cognitivists consider how human retrospect works to get up learning. For example, the physiological processes of sorting and encoding information and events into short term fund and long term fund are important to educators working under the cognitive theory.The major difference between gestalt ists and behaviorists is the locus of control everyplace the learning activity the individual learner is much key to gestaltists than the environment that behaviorists emphasize. Once memory theories like the Atkinson-Shiffrin memory model and Baddeleys working memory model were established as a theoretical framework in cognitive psychology, new cognitive frameworks of learning began to emerge during the 1970s, 80s, and 90s. Today, researchers are concentrating on topics like cognitive load and information processing theory.These theories of learning cheer a role in influencing statemental design. citation needed Aspects of cognitivism can be implant in learning how to learn, social role acquirement, intelligence, learning, and memory as cerebrate to age. edit Constructivism Main article Constructivism (learning theory) Constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner actively constructs or builds new ideas or concepts based upon authentic and past knowledge o r experience. In other words, learning involves constructing virtuosos possess knowledge from unrivaleds own experiences. Constructivist learning, therefore, is a very face-to-face endeavor, whereby internalized concepts, rules, and general principles may consequently be applied in a practical real- solid ground context. This is besides known as social constructivism (see social constructivism). Social constructivists posit that knowledge is constructed when individuals engage socially in talk and activity about overlap problems or tasks. Learning is seen as the process by which individuals are introduced to a culture by much skilled members(Driver et al. , 1994) Constructivism itself has many variations, such as Active learning, discovery learning, and knowledge building.Regardless of the variety, constructivism put forwards a students free exploration deep down a given framework or structure. citation neededThe teacher acts as a facilitator who encourages students to disco ver principles for themselves and to construct knowledge by working to solve hard-nosed problems. Aspects of constructivism can be found in self-directed learning, transformational learning, experiential learning, find cognition, and reflective practice and religious practice. edit Informal and post-modern theories Informal theories of education may attempt to break down the learning process in out of bounds of practicalitycitation needed. single of these deals with whether learning should take place as a building of concepts toward an general idea, or the understanding of the overall idea with the details filled in later. Criticscitation needed believe that trying to teach an overall idea without details (facts) is like trying to build a masonry structure without bricks Other concerns are the origins of the apparent motion for learningcitation needed. Somewho? argue that learning is primarily self-regulated, and that the ideal learning situation is integrity dissimilar to t he modern classroomcitation needed.Critics argue that students learning in isolation failcitation needed. edit Other learning theories Other learning theories have also been developed for more specific purposes than general learning theories. For example, andragogy is the art and science to help adults learn. Connectivism is a recent theory of Networked learning which focuses on learning as do connections. Multimedia learning theory focuses on principles for the effective use of multimedia in learning. edit Criticism Criticism of learning theories that underlie traditional educational practices claims there is no need for such a theory.The attempt to cover the process of learning through theory construction has created more problems than it has solved. It kick upstairs claims that in order to make up for the feeling of inadequacy in confronting a process that we dont really address, we label something learning and measure it. thence were comfortable, because at least then we hav e the feeling that we have a grasp on the problem. We dont really follow the process, but in emplacement of a profound understanding of whats going on, we find something and say, Lets declare that to be learning, by consensus. This is basically what the entire educational system the world over has done quantify learning by breaking it up into mensural pieces-curricula, courses, hours, tests, and grades. The assumption is that psychologically one knows enough about the mind to draw aptitudes the accepted (knowledge-based) conception of learning identifies four assumptions of the accepted view of learning that (some) one knows what ought to be learned by flock, why it ought to be learned, how it ought to be learned, and by whom each thing ought to be learned.Together these assumptions are the lenses through which wad have been socialized in our culture to judge whether learning is occurring or not and a merely assumption is that once one knows aptitudes, one also knows how to tr ack a person so he go out in fact reach the goal that is being set out for him. The whole approach is the ultimate in pedagogical and psychological technology. The only trouble is hat it is humanly absurd. In this society, such a process is exceptionally subtle, because it involves an authoritarian approach deep down a free culture. By employing a variety of ruses the system produces a process which allows it to inhibit face-to-face freedom without really feeling that this is what is going on. The person doesnt feel that something tyrannical is being done to himwhich is in fact what is happening. 23Learning TheoryFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation, search This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2008) This article may contain original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding references. Statemen ts consisting only of original research may be removed. More details may be available on the talk page. (January 2010)In psychology and education, learning is commonly defined as a process that brings together cognitive, emotional, and environmental influences and experiences for acquiring, enhancing, or making changes in ones knowledge, skills, values, and world views (Illeris, 2000 Ormorod, 1995). Learning as a process focuses on what happens when the learning takes place. Explanations of what happens seduce learning theories. A learning theory is an attempt to describe how people and animals learn, thereby helping us understand the inherently complex process of learning.Learning theories have two chief values according to Hill (2002). One is in providing us with vocabulary and a conceptual framework for interlingual rendition the examples of learning that we observe. The other is in suggesting where to look for solutions to practical problems. The theories do not give us soluti ons, but they do direct our attention to those variables that are crucial in finding solutions. There are three principal(prenominal) categories or philosophical frameworks under which learning theories fall behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. Behaviorism focuses only on the objectively observable aspects of learning.Cognitive theories look beyond behavior to explain brain-based learning. And constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner actively constructs or builds new ideas or concepts. Contents hide 1 Behaviorism 2 Cognitivism 3 Constructivism 4 Informal and post-modern theories 5 Other learning theories 6 Criticism 7 Other interests 8 See also 9 Notes 10 External links edit Behaviorism Main article Behaviorism Behaviorism as a theory was primarily developed by B. F. Skinner. It loosely encompasses the work of people like Edward Thorndike, Tolman, Guthrie, and Hull.What characterizes these investigators are their underlying assumptions about the proc ess of learning. In essence, three basic assumptions are held to be true. original research? First, learning is manifested by a change in behavior. Second, the environment shapes behavior. And third, the principles of propinquity (how close in time two events must be for a bond to be formed) and reinforcement (any means of increasing the likelihood that an event will be repeated) are central to explaining the learning process. For behaviorism, learning is the acquisition of new behavior through conditioning.There are two types of possible conditioning 1) Classical conditioning, where the behavior becomes a reflex response to stimulus as in the case of Pavlovs Dogs. Pavlov was interested in studying reflexes, when he axiom that the dogs drooled without the proper stimulus. Although no food was in sight, their saliva still dribbled. It cancelled out that the dogs were reacting to lab coats. Every time the dogs were served food, the person who served the food was wearing a lab coat . Therefore, the dogs reacted as if food was on its way whenever they saw a lab coat.In a series of experiments, Pavlov then tried to go into out how these phenomena were linked. For example, he struck a bell when the dogs were fed. If the bell was sounded in close association with their meal, the dogs learned to associate the sound of the bell with food. later a while, at the mere sound of the bell, they responded by drooling. 2) Operant conditioning where there is reinforcement of the behavior by a reward or a punishment. The theory of operant conditioning was developed by B. F. Skinner and is known as Radical Behaviorism.The word operant refers to the way in which behavior operates on the environment. Briefly, a behavior may result either in reinforcement, which increases the likelihood of the behavior recurring, or punishment, which decreases the likelihood of the behavior recurring. It is important to note that, a punishment is not considered to be applicable if it does not r esult in the reduction of the behavior, and so the terms punishment and reinforcement are determined as a result of the actions. at heart this framework, behaviorists are particularly interested in measurable changes in behavior.Educational approaches such as applied behavior analysis, curriculum based measurement, and direct instruction have emerged from this model. 1 edit Cognitivism Main article Cognitivism (psychology) The earliest challenge to the behaviorists came in a publication in 1929 by Bode, a gestalt psychologist. He criticized behaviorists for being as well as dependent on overt behavior to explain learning. Gestalt psychologists proposed looking at the patterns rather than isolated events. Gestalt views of learning have been incorporated into what have come to be labeled cognitive theories.Two key assumptions underlie this cognitive approach (1) that the memory system is an active organized processor of information and (2) that forward knowledge plays an important role in learning. Cognitive theories look beyond behavior to explain brain-based learning. Cognitivists consider how human memory works to promote learning. For example, the physiological processes of sorting and encoding information and events into short term memory and long term memory are important to educators working under the cognitive theory.The major difference between gestaltists and behaviorists is the locus of control over the learning activity the individual learner is more key to gestaltists than the environment that behaviorists emphasize. Once memory theories like the Atkinson-Shiffrin memory model and Baddeleys working memory model were established as a theoretical framework in cognitive psychology, new cognitive frameworks of learning began to emerge during the 1970s, 80s, and 90s. Today, researchers are concentrating on topics like cognitive load and information processing theory.These theories of learning play a role in influencing instructional design. citation n eeded Aspects of cognitivism can be found in learning how to learn, social role acquisition, intelligence, learning, and memory as cogitate to age. edit Constructivism Main article Constructivism (learning theory) Constructivism views learning as a process in which the learner actively constructs or builds new ideas or concepts based upon new and past knowledge or experience. In other words, learning involves constructing ones own knowledge from ones own experiences. Constructivist learning, therefore, is a very personal endeavor, whereby internalized concepts, rules, and general principles may consequently be applied in a practical real-world context. This is also known as social constructivism (see social constructivism). Social constructivists posit that knowledge is constructed when individuals engage socially in talk and activity about shared out problems or tasks. Learning is seen as the process by which individuals are introduced to a culture by more skilled members(Driver et al. , 1994) Constructivism itself has many variations, such as Active learning, discovery learning, and knowledge building.Regardless of the variety, constructivism promotes a students free exploration within a given framework or structure. citation neededThe teacher acts as a facilitator who encourages students to discover principles for themselves and to construct knowledge by working to solve pictorial problems. Aspects of constructivism can be found in self-directed learning, transformational learning, experiential learning, set(p) cognition, and reflective practice and religious practice. edit Informal and post-modern theories Informal theories of education may attempt to break down the learning process in chase of practicalitycitation needed.One of these deals with whether learning should take place as a building of concepts toward an overall idea, or the understanding of the overall idea with the details filled in later. Criticscitation needed believe that trying to tea ch an overall idea without details (facts) is like trying to build a masonry structure without bricks Other concerns are the origins of the fag for learningcitation needed. Somewho? argue that learning is primarily self-regulated, and that the ideal learning situation is one dissimilar to the modern classroomcitation needed.Critics argue that students learning in isolation failcitation needed. edit Other learning theories Other learning theories have also been developed for more specific purposes than general learning theories. For example, andragogy is the art and science to help adults learn. Connectivism is a recent theory of Networked learning which focuses on learning as making connections. Multimedia learning theory focuses on principles for the effective use of multimedia in learning. edit Criticism Criticism of learning theories that underlie traditional educational practices claims there is no need for such a theory.The attempt to comprehend the process of learning throug h theory construction has created more problems than it has solved. It further claims that in order to make up for the feeling of inadequacy in confronting a process that we dont really comprehend, we label something learning and measure it. past were comfortable, because at least then we have the feeling that we have a grasp on the problem. We dont really follow the process, but in plaza of a profound understanding of whats going on, we find something and say, Lets declare that to be learning, by consensus. This is basically what the entire educational system the world over has done quantify learning by breaking it up into measurable pieces-curricula, courses, hours, tests, and grades. The assumption is that psychologically one knows enough about the mind to fall upon aptitudes the accepted (knowledge-based) conception of learning identifies four assumptions of the accepted view of learning that (some) one knows what ought to be learned by people, why it ought to be learned, how it ought to be learned, and by whom each thing ought to be learned.Together these assumptions are the lenses through which people have been socialized in our culture to judge whether learning is occurring or not and a further assumption is that once one knows aptitudes, one also knows how to track a person so he will in fact reach the goal that is being set out for him. The whole approach is the ultimate in pedagogical and psychological technology. The only trouble is hat it is humanly absurd. In this society, such a process is exceptionally subtle, because it involves an authoritarian approach within a free culture. By employing a variety of ruses the system produces a process which allows it to inhibit personal freedom without really feeling that this is what is going on. The person doesnt feel that something peremptory is being done to himwhich is in fact what is happening. 23