Chief Justice Earl Warren

In the browned vs control panel of Education, the United States Supreme solicit ruled against requisition in public schools. According to a unanimous last which was delivered by head human being Justice Earl Warren himself, the separate unless follow principle which had been adopted in connection with Plessy v. Fergusson could non be applied to public bringing up (Brown v. Board of Education). Immediately after the decision was handed down, plurality for and against the ruling reacted accordingly. Newspapers not only published articles which either hailed or supported the court decision but re pick outed to surveys as well.The heart of the first cartoon is very clear the United States Supreme move, the highest court of the land, declares to alone and sundry that according to its interpretation of the constitution of the kingdom, specifically the Fourteenth Amendment, there should be no separatism in education. This was reminiscent of the reaction published in the Tim es of New York on whitethorn 18, 1954 authorize All Gods Chillun which said that Jefferson and company, in declaring the independence proclaimed that all men were, and ought to be, equal before the law.If men are equal, children are equal, too. There is an even greater necessity in the oddball of children, whose opportunities to advance themselves and to be useful to the community may be lost if they do not pay off the right to be educated (Brown v. Board of Education). In the second cartoon, the slow reaction towards racial desegregation in the s fall outhern states is depicted. It was meant to show that after the decision on Brown v.Board of Education, desegregation in education was not being implemented in the south fast enough, the reason why a man garbed in a graduation gown and cap is offering the use of a look sharp horse so that the plow could be pulled much faster, thereby desegregating public schools more rapidly. It should be remembered that the pack in the south d id not openly welcome the desegregation ruling of the Supreme Court. As pointed out by a May 18, 1954 article in the University of Virginias Cavalier Daily, To many people this decision is contrary to a way of life and violates the way in which they have thought since 1619 (Brown v.Board of Education). The third cartoon shows the use of an anvil, hammer and chisel to cut the chain that had manacled public education to racial segregation. It was a sort of a euphoric celebration resulting from the Supreme Court decision. In a way, it showed the power of the Supreme Court in dealing with basic human rights issues such as the education segregation. Equality Redefined, a May 18, 1954 report published in the Boston Herald, hailed the ruling and stated that it was a healthy sign that the countrys Constitution was alive and serving its intended purpose, saying that desegregation was an expediency of the time (Brown v. Board of Education).Finally, the fourth and last cartoon proclaimed that the Supreme Court decision desegregating the public schools proved to be a very potent weapon for democracy that dealt a crushing blow to racial segregation. The cartoon was a fitting illustration of a reaction printed in the May 18, 1954 issue of the Chicago defender which said that Neither the atom bomb nor the hydrogen bomb will ever be as meaningful to our democracy as the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that racial segregation violates the spirit and letter of our Constitution (Brown v. Board of Education).Cartoons are a powerful form of political description even today. While it is undeniably true that printed words, in the hands of a wordsmith, acquire an overpowering impression toppling even feared dictators, cartoons have proven even more effective than any printed matter. Cliches and poetry have been utilise to compare the two. While it has been said that the pen is mightier than the sword, was it not also written that a picture paints a th ousand words? The four cartoons described above were no doubt effective relative to the fulfilment after the Supreme Court decision re Brown v. Board of Education because of the powerful message that they conveyed. For instance, the cartoon showing an exploding bomb accurately brings home the message that the desegregation of public schools was an overwhelming event, more powerful in its effect than the atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima several years earlier. Work Cited Brown v. Board of Education. Landmark Supreme Court Cases. 2002. 11 September 2007. http//www. landmarkcases. org/brown/opinion1. html